I’m curious if metrics aren’t driving these choices (ie the tail wagging the dog). As the prices of shooting and marketing films skyrockets, appetite for risk decreases. So, would you consider checking if Q scores and other ‘actor recognizability’ rankings are a factor. How about previous successful movies? ie. If you’re a money maker we’ll hire you again until you drop or shoot a flop. Thanks
I’m curious if metrics aren’t driving these choices (ie the tail wagging the dog). As the prices of shooting and marketing films skyrockets, appetite for risk decreases. So, would you consider checking if Q scores and other ‘actor recognizability’ rankings are a factor. How about previous successful movies? ie. If you’re a money maker we’ll hire you again until you drop or shoot a flop. Thanks
I’m curious if metrics aren’t driving these choices (ie the tail wagging the dog). As the prices of shooting and marketing films skyrockets, appetite for risk decreases. So, would you consider checking if Q scores and other ‘actor recognizability’ rankings are a factor. How about previous successful movies? ie. If you’re a money maker we’ll hire you again until you drop or shoot a flop. Thanks