Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steven's avatar

All true Stephen and I was trying to support Raquelle's point. But like Lindsay Brigman said in 'The Abyss': 'Don't be on my side!', ha!

My biases didn't help. What I consider 'serious' film to be that would greatly improve women director numbers would not be 'Clueless' or 'Sleepless in Seattle'. That's on me. I simply should have wrote what you did: women just aren't getting enough chances.

But then what needs to be done? Bigelow did 'Point Break' in what, '91? 'Hurt Locker' got her the Best Director nod. Did those decades of Bigelow films and Oscar improve the ranks? Her stories are male centric with a strong woman sprinkled in, leading or otherwise.

And what if 'Obsession' had been written and directed by a woman? Is the film stil received as a great scary movie or is it just 'women whining again about men just wanting women as sex slaves'?

I saw both 'Portrait of a Woman...' and 'Promising Young Woman' in the theater. I don't recall much of 'Portrait' and in 'Promising' Carey Mulligan's character died in her quest. Killed by a man.

Let me leave off with this: I am currently in film school (Miami Dade College). When my Film Production 1 class was asked what role we aspired to, none of the girls wanted to be directors. They all wanted to be cinematographers or writers. Huh?!

At least women are being given projects that have hundred million dollar budgets. Slow and steady I'm afraid.

Raquelle David's avatar

Interesting article, but I do think the takeaway here isn’t really age. It’s why women directors have consistently worked on such few films over long stretches of time in Hollywood without meaningful improvement. I just published an article about this. In 2025 women directed films hit an ALL TIME LOW at 8.5% which means that male directors are getting hired 11 times more often than a women.

Surely age isn’t that big of a factor when we’re looking at 51 percent of the population?

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?